Berkshire requires a 25–50% discount to intrinsic value before buying.
Buffett Quality Checklist
✗ROE >15% consistently (≥7 of last 10 years)
✓Free cash flow positive (≥8 of last 10 years)
✓Conservative leverage — Debt/Equity below 1
✓Revenue growing at CAGR >5%
✓EPS growing at CAGR >5%
10-Year Financial History — SEC EDGAR 10-K Filings
Year▲
Revenue▲
Net Income▲
FCF▲
Owner Earnings▲
ROE▲
Net Margin▲
LT Debt▲
Cash▲
2016
$13.2B
-$1.7B
$2.7B
-$2.1B
-7.9%
-13.1%
—
$3.1B
2017
$4.1B
$239.0M
$5.5B
-$379.0M
1.2%
5.8%
$17.5B
$11.2B
2018
$5.3B
$6.2B
$8.2B
$6.1B
23.4%
117.0%
$17.5B
$4.3B
2019
$22.6B
—
$9.3B
—
—
—
$32.8B
$5.1B
2020
$23.9B
—
$11.6B
—
—
—
$41.0B
$7.6B
2021
$27.4B
—
$13.3B
—
—
—
$39.7B
$12.2B
2022
$33.2B
$11.5B
$16.3B
$11.6B
50.6%
34.6%
—
$12.4B
2023
$35.8B
$14.1B
$17.6B
$14.1B
58.7%
39.3%
—
$14.2B
2024
$51.6B
$5.9B
$19.4B
$5.9B
8.7%
11.4%
—
$9.3B
2025
$63.9B
—
$26.9B
—
—
—
—
$16.2B
Warren & Charlie
Buffett / Munger — quality, moat & valuation
Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) — Investment Memo
🐂 The Bull Case (Warren's voice)
The Ultimate Toll Booth: Broadcom doesn't compete in the fickle consumer market; they own the essential plumbing of the digital economy. Whether it's a packet moving through a data center or a virtual machine running an enterprise app, they collect a fee.
** Pricing Power is the Only Moat**: Their ability to raise prices without losing customers is exceptional. When a product is "mission-critical" and the cost of switching is operational suicide, the seller dictates the terms.
The FCF Engine: I ignore the "accounting noise" of amortization. The truth is in the cash. $19.4B in FCF against a decimated Net Income tells me the business is a cash-cow disguised as an expensive acquisition machine.
AI as a Tailwind, Not a Pivot: They aren't gambling on AI; they are providing the picks and shovels (Custom ASICs) that allow the giants to build it.
Attractive Entry: This becomes a Berkshire-grade investment when the price reflects the predictability of the cash flows rather than the hype of the AI cycle.
🐻 The Bear Case (Charlie inverts)
Munger's rule: "Show me where I'll die and I won't go there."
The "Empire-Building" Trap: Hock Tan is a master of the roll-up, but complexity is the enemy of long-term compounding. The VMware integration is a massive bet; if the "squeeze" of existing customers leads to a permanent exodus toward open-source alternatives, the software moat evaporates.
The Regulatory Guillotine: Broadcom behaves like a monopoly because, in several niches, it is one. A concerted antitrust effort to break up the "plumbing" or cap pricing on essential components would permanently impair the compounding machine.
Technological Obsolescence: A paradigm shift in how data is moved (e.g., a fundamental shift away from traditional Ethernet/PCIe standards) would render their current silicon portfolio worthless overnight.
Most Likely Threat: The VMware customer revolt. Timeframe: 2–5 years. If the aggressive shift to subscription pricing alienates the core user base, the "toll booth" loses its traffic.
💰 Valuation & Margin of Safety
Based on the provided DCF analysis:
Intrinsic value estimate: $101.60 per share.
25% margin of safety entry: $76.20(conservative).
50% margin of safety entry: $50.80(Buffett's ideal).
Current Status: Expensive. The market is pricing in aggressive AI growth and a flawless VMware transition, while the DCF reflects a more disciplined, modest growth rate. The gap between the market price and the $101.60 intrinsic value is a "speculator's premium" we do not pay.
Verdict: PASS
The moat is a fortress, but the price is a fantasy. We do not buy wonderful businesses at unwonderful prices. Wait for the AI hype to cycle out or for the VMware integration to hit a snag.
Research Notes· Money Model · Moat · Financials · Management
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (10-K only). For educational purposes — not investment advice.