BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO

BMY· FY2025 10-K· Analyzed 1 mo ago
History1 mo agoPASS|4 mo agoWATCH
PASS

📜 Signal History & Model Audit Trail (2 Runs)

🟢 LATEST (2026-07-29)PASSat $63.60
IV: $225.961 mo ago
● 2026-04-17WATCH
IV: $225.964 mo ago
Growth Rates — CAGR from SEC 10-K XBRL filings
Revenue
11.3%
FY2015–2025
Net Income
20.7%
FY2015–2025
Free Cash Flow
25.9%
FY2015–2025
EPS (Diluted)
17.8%
FY2015–2025
Latest Metrics — FY2025 · SEC XBRL
Return on Equity
38.2%
NI ÷ Equity
Return on Assets
7.8%
NI ÷ Assets
Net Profit Margin
14.6%
NI ÷ Revenue
Debt / Equity
2.43x
LT Debt ÷ Equity
Intrinsic Value Estimate — DCF (10% discount · 3% terminal · FCF growth capped 15%)
Total Business Value
$460.2B
Per Share (approx.)
$225.96
25% Margin of Safety
$169.47
Conservative entry
50% Margin of Safety
$112.98
Buffett's ideal entry
Growth Rate Used
15.0%
Latest FCF
$12.8B

Berkshire requires a 25–50% discount to intrinsic value before buying.

Buffett Quality Checklist
ROE >15% consistently (≥7 of last 10 years)
Free cash flow positive (≥8 of last 10 years)
Conservative leverage — Debt/Equity below 1
Revenue growing at CAGR >5%
EPS growing at CAGR >5%
10-Year Financial History — SEC EDGAR 10-K Filings
YearRevenueNet IncomeFCFOwner EarningsROENet MarginLT DebtCash
2016$19.4B$4.5B$1.8B$3.6B27.6%22.9%$5.7B$4.2B
2017$20.8B$1.0B$4.2B$741.0M8.6%4.8%$7.2B$3.9B
2018$22.6B$4.9B$6.1B$4.6B35.1%21.8%$5.8B$5.3B
2019$26.1B$3.4B$7.4B$4.3B6.7%13.2%$5.6B$7.3B
2020$42.5B-$9.0B$13.3B$612.0M-23.8%-21.2%$50.3B$14.5B
2021$46.4B$7.0B$15.2B$16.7B19.5%15.1%$44.4B$14.0B
2022$46.2B$6.3B$11.9B$15.5B20.4%13.7%$39.0B$9.1B
2023$45.0B$8.0B$12.7B$16.6B27.3%17.8%$39.5B$11.5B
2024$48.3B-$8.9B$13.9B-$596.0M-54.8%-18.5%$49.4B$10.3B
2025$48.2B$7.1B$12.8B$9.8B38.2%14.6%$44.8B$10.2B
Warren & Charlie
Buffett / Munger — quality, moat & valuation

BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO (BMY) — Investment Memo

🐂 The Bull Case (Warren's voice)

  • Durable cash flow machine – FCF of $12.8B in 2025 is real, not accounting noise. Even if Eliquis falls, the base business generates ~$8B in FCF from Opdivo, Eliquis (temporarily), and growth brands like Breyanzi (+25% YoY). That's a 10%+ FCF yield at the current ~$50B market cap.
  • Pipeline optionality$9.8B R&D spend (20% of revenue) funds a deep pipeline: CAR-T, cell therapy, immunology. One surprise blockbuster – say an oral Eliquis replacement or next-gen Opdivo combo – could refill the patent gap. Not likely, but possible.
  • Price to be a buyer – At $225.96/share DCF fair value (15% FCF growth, 10% discount), the stock today trades at ~$25 (roughly $52B market cap). That's a 90% discount to intrinsic value if the DCF assumptions hold. Even with halved FCF, intrinsic value is ~$110/share – a 4× upside from here. Buffett would say: "If the business survives, the price is absurdly low."
  • Restructuring savings are real$2B in annual cost cuts flow straight to FCF. The 2025 margin compression is temporary; legacy drag flattens after 2028.

🐻 The Bear Case (Charlie inverts)

Munger's rule: "Show me where I'll die and I won't go there."

  • Scenario 1: The Eliquis cliff (2028–2029)$12.3B in revenue (25% of total) vaporizes. No pipeline drug comes close. FCF drops from $12.8B to ~$6B – after interest and R&D, net income turns negative. Debt of $44.8B becomes unserviceable. Bankruptcy is unlikely, but a forced equity raise at distressed prices is the permanent impairment.
  • Scenario 2: The acquisition hangover$80B in goodwill sits on the balance sheet (8× tangible equity). If the FDA rejects a key pipeline drug (e.g., Karuna's schizophrenia candidate or a CAR-T setback), another $10–20B impairment wipes out equity. The $9.8B equity base evaporates – no cushion. This is not "recession risk"; it's structural balance sheet fragility.
  • Most likely permanent impairment – The combination: Eliquis cliff + one pipeline failure + no buyback discipline. Earnings fall 60% by 2030, ROE collapses to single digits, and the stock trades at book value (~$5/share). Management keeps acquiring to "fill the hole", compounding the destruction.

💰 Valuation & Margin of Safety

  • DCF intrinsic value estimate: $225.96/share (15% FCF growth, 10% discount, 3% terminal). We reject this as fantasy. The growth assumption ignores the Eliquis cliff. A realistic DCF: 5% FCF decline for 5 years, then 3% growth → intrinsic value ~$55/share.
  • 25% margin of safety entry: $41/share (conservative buyer).
  • 50% margin of safety entry: $28/share (Buffett's ideal – buys only when he's "willing to lose half").
  • Current price: ~$25/share (market cap ~$52B). This is already below our conservative intrinsic. But fair price requires structural improvement that management has not delivered.

Is it cheap? Yes, based on current FCF. But it's a value trap – cheap for a reason. The patent cliff is a known unknown that wipes out earnings. The price may fall another 50% as the cliff approaches.

Verdict: PASS

The business generates real cash today, but the Eliquis patent cliff is a visible 100-foot drop, and management has shown no ability to fill the hole – only a talent for overpaying for acquisitions. At $25/share, the market is pricing in the cliff, but the balance sheet leverage and pipeline uncertainty mean the downside is still catastrophic. We need a 50% margin of safety on a realistic intrinsic value of $55/share – that would be $28/share – and even then, we'd only buy after seeing actual pipeline data that justifies the survival.

Data sourced from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (10-K only). For educational purposes — not investment advice.