Berkshire requires a 25–50% discount to intrinsic value before buying.
Buffett Quality Checklist
✗ROE >15% consistently (≥7 of last 10 years)
✓Free cash flow positive (≥8 of last 10 years)
✓Conservative leverage — Debt/Equity below 1
✓Revenue growing at CAGR >5%
✗EPS growing at CAGR >5%
10-Year Financial History — SEC EDGAR 10-K Filings
Year▲
Revenue▲
Net Income▲
FCF▲
Owner Earnings▲
ROE▲
Net Margin▲
LT Debt▲
Cash▲
2016
$16.9B
$2.6B
$2.9B
$3.1B
11.1%
15.1%
$12.3B
$963.7M
2017
$4.2B
$2.5B
$2.9B
$3.0B
9.5%
59.3%
$10.5B
$630.3M
2018
$4.7B
$2.7B
$3.4B
$3.2B
9.4%
56.5%
$9.7B
$787.8M
2019
$17.9B
$3.0B
$3.3B
$3.6B
9.9%
16.8%
$21.7B
$19.9B
2020
$22.3B
$3.6B
$5.4B
$4.6B
9.2%
16.4%
$21.2B
—
2021
$24.8B
$6.4B
$7.1B
$7.3B
14.2%
25.9%
$22.2B
—
2022
$26.6B
$7.2B
$7.4B
$8.2B
14.4%
27.1%
$19.7B
—
2023
$23.9B
$4.8B
$5.8B
$5.5B
8.9%
19.9%
$18.4B
—
2024
$23.9B
$3.9B
$5.3B
$3.2B
7.9%
16.3%
$16.0B
—
2025
$24.6B
$3.6B
$5.3B
$3.2B
6.9%
14.7%
$18.4B
—
Warren & Charlie
Buffett / Munger — quality, moat & valuation
DANAHER CORP /DE/ (DHR) — Investment Memo
🐂 The Bull Case (Warren's voice)
The Toll-Bridge Economics: Danaher has successfully positioned itself in the middle of a massive global industry—scientific research and diagnostics. Once a lab adopts their equipment and validates the protocols, the cost of switching is not just financial; it is a regulatory and operational nightmare. This is the definition of a "moat."
Razor-and-Blade Compounding: The initial equipment sale is simply the entry fee. The true value lies in the $24.6B revenue stream that is dominated by high-margin, recurring consumables. It is a business that essentially taxes the progress of medical science.
Cash Flow Integrity: The quality of earnings is excellent. When you see FCF of $5.3B outpacing NI of $3.6B, you know you are looking at a business that collects hard cash, not accounting fiction. That is a hallmark of a high-quality franchise.
The Ideal Price: If the market ever stops pricing this as a "growth" stock and starts pricing it as the stable, cash-generative utility it is, the opportunity would be compelling. We want the toll bridge, but only when we can buy the toll booth at a sensible price.
🐻 The Bear Case (Charlie inverts)
Munger’s Rule: “Show me where I'll die and I won't go there.”
The Acquisition Treadmill: Danaher has become addicted to "bolt-on" acquisitions like Abcam to mask internal stagnation. When a company with such a formidable moat sees its ROE crash from 11.1% to 6.9%, it tells you one thing: they are running out of good ideas. They are essentially buying growth rather than creating it.
The Spin-off Shell Game: The collapse of revenue from $16.9B to $4.2B (via spin-offs) proves that this company is more about financial engineering than sustainable business evolution. Eventually, you run out of parts to spin off and companies to acquire. When the M&A engine stalls, the stock will crater because there is no underlying organic growth engine to pick up the slack.
Capital Allocation Myopia: Reinvesting at a 6.9% return is a disaster. It is a slow-motion destruction of shareholder value. If management keeps pouring money into low-return acquisitions, they are effectively turning capital into ash. We don't invest in businesses that destroy value with every dollar they reinvest.
💰 Valuation & Margin of Safety
Our DCF model reflects a business that is growing, but struggling to convert capital into high returns.
Intrinsic value estimate: $125.10 per share
25% margin of safety entry: $93.83
50% margin of safety entry: $62.55
Assessment: The company is currently significantly expensive. The market is paying a premium for the "Danaher name," ignoring the glaring trend of deteriorating returns on capital and the reliance on continuous, high-cost acquisitions to keep the top line moving.
Verdict: PASS
We are passing on Danaher because the current market price reflects a premium that the company’s degrading returns on capital simply do not justify. While the underlying "razor-and-blade" franchise remains stable, management's obsession with acquisition-fueled growth at the expense of shareholder value is a path to permanent capital impairment. We will keep them on the watch list, but only at a price that provides a massive margin of safety for their capital allocation errors.
Other Analyst Views· Lynch · Damodaran
Research Notes· Money Model · Moat · Financials · Management
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (10-K only). For educational purposes — not investment advice.