DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC

DRI· FY2025 10-K· Analyzed 1 mo ago
PASS
Growth Rates — CAGR from SEC 10-K XBRL filings
Revenue
6.0%
FY2015–2025
Net Income
4.4%
FY2015–2025
Free Cash Flow
EPS (Diluted)
5.5%
FY2015–2025
Latest Metrics — FY2025 · SEC XBRL
Return on Equity
45.4%
NI ÷ Equity
Return on Assets
8.3%
NI ÷ Assets
Net Profit Margin
8.7%
NI ÷ Revenue
Debt / Equity
0.92x
LT Debt ÷ Equity
Intrinsic Value Estimate — DCF (10% discount · 3% terminal · FCF growth capped 15%)
Total Business Value
$13.6B
Per Share (approx.)
$115.84
25% Margin of Safety
$86.88
Conservative entry
50% Margin of Safety
$57.92
Buffett's ideal entry
Growth Rate Used
3.0%
Latest FCF
$921.1M

Berkshire requires a 25–50% discount to intrinsic value before buying.

Buffett Quality Checklist
ROE >15% consistently (≥7 of last 10 years)
Free cash flow positive (≥8 of last 10 years)
Conservative leverage — Debt/Equity below 1
Revenue growing at CAGR >5%
EPS growing at CAGR >5%
10-Year Financial History — SEC EDGAR 10-K Filings
YearRevenueNet IncomeFCFOwner EarningsROENet MarginLT DebtCash
2016$6.9B$375.0M$436.9M19.2%5.4%$440.0M$274.8M
2017$7.2B$479.1M$459.0M22.8%6.7%$936.6M$233.1M
2018$8.1B$596.0M$513.1M27.2%7.4%$926.5M$146.9M
2019$8.5B$713.4M$598.1M29.8%8.4%$927.7M$457.3M
2020$7.8B-$52.4M-$156.4M-2.2%-0.7%$928.8M$763.3M
2021$7.2B$629.3M$725.3M22.4%8.7%$929.8M$1.2B
2022$9.6B$952.8M$944.3M43.3%9.9%$901.0M$420.6M
2023$10.5B$981.9M$804.8M44.6%9.4%$884.9M$367.8M
2024$11.4B$1.0B$886.3M45.8%9.0%$1.4B$194.8M
2025$12.1B$1.0B$921.1M45.4%8.7%$2.1B$240.0M
Warren & Charlie
Buffett / Munger — quality, moat & valuation

DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC (DRI) — Investment Memo

🐂 The Bull Case (Warren's voice)

  • The Power of Mundanity: Darden succeeds because it offers exactly what the American consumer craves: predictability. In a world of chaos, the Olive Garden salad bowl is a constant. This is not about gastronomy; it is about the "logistics of comfort."
  • The Supply Chain Moat: Darden is a supply chain operator disguised as a restaurant group. Their ability to source proteins, produce, and packaging at scale—and distribute them to thousands of locations—creates a cost barrier that fragmented competitors cannot bridge. When commodity prices spike, Darden’s scale provides a cushion that smaller operators simply do not have.
  • Pricing Power: While margins are pressured, Darden’s sheer size allows them to raise prices marginally across a massive base without a catastrophic drop in traffic. It is a "toll bridge" model; they own the route to the family dinner table.
  • Attractive Price Range: If the market ever loses its mind and punishes the stock due to a temporary labor cost spike or a bad quarter, that is when we step in. We are looking for a valuation that implies the market thinks they are in terminal decline, when in reality, they are just in a temporary period of margin optimization.

🐻 The Bear Case (Charlie inverts)

  • The "Treadmill" Trap: Look at the numbers. Revenue is climbing, but Net Income is effectively dead money at $1.0B. This is the definition of value destruction. Management is running harder just to stand still. They are buying Chuy’s not because it is a brilliant capital allocator’s move, but because the core business has run out of gas and they need to artificially inflate the top line.
  • Structural Labor Inflation: Restaurants are essentially high-labor, low-margin assembly lines. With minimum wage pressures and the difficulty of finding staff, Darden is fighting a war against the clock. Unless they invent a robot that can bus tables and cook pasta without complaining, labor costs will eventually devour what remains of their operating margins.
  • The "Casual Dining" Irrelevance: The biggest risk is the consumer shift. Younger generations do not value the "sit-down chain" experience the way their parents did. They prefer convenience (delivery) or "fast-casual" (Chipotle-style). Darden is building cathedrals for a congregation that is shrinking. That is a permanent impairment of brand equity.

💰 Valuation & Margin of Safety

Using our DCF estimate of $13.6B total, the intrinsic value per share is $115.84.

  • Intrinsic value estimate: $115.84
  • 25% margin of safety entry: $86.88 (conservative)
  • 50% margin of safety entry: $57.92 (Buffett's ideal)
  • Verdict: The stock is currently expensive. We are seeing a business where capital is being re-invested at diminishing rates of return (evidenced by the $1.0B income ceiling), and the market is pricing it as a growth stock. We are paying for "potential" that management has failed to deliver over the last four years.

Verdict: PASS

We cannot justify paying a premium for a business that generates stagnant earnings despite massive revenue expansion. The current valuation provides zero margin of safety for a company struggling with structural margin compression. We will watch from the sidelines until the price reflects the reality of a no-growth, capital-intensive utility.

Other Analyst Views· Lynch · Damodaran
Research Notes· Money Model · Moat · Financials · Management

Data sourced from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (10-K only). For educational purposes — not investment advice.