10-Year Financial History — SEC EDGAR 10-K Filings
Year▲
Revenue▲
Net Income▲
FCF▲
Owner Earnings▲
ROE▲
Net Margin▲
LT Debt▲
Cash▲
2016
$374.7M
$210.4M
—
—
25.8%
56.1%
$24.8M
$189.1M
2017
$399.3M
$197.0M
—
—
23.0%
49.3%
$74.7M
$215.7M
2018
$2.4B
$288.2M
—
—
29.6%
12.1%
$97.9M
$266.4M
2019
$2.5B
$316.8M
—
—
28.0%
12.8%
$95.8M
—
2020
$2.5B
$293.3M
—
—
24.7%
11.6%
$93.8M
—
2021
$2.6B
$297.9M
—
—
22.2%
11.3%
$91.7M
—
2022
$2.8B
$298.6M
—
—
20.6%
10.5%
$0
—
2023
$3.3B
$446.1M
—
—
26.8%
13.6%
—
—
2024
$3.8B
$600.3M
—
—
30.2%
15.8%
—
—
2025
$4.1B
$559.3M
—
—
24.5%
13.8%
—
—
Warren & Charlie
Buffett / Munger — quality, moat & valuation
ERIE INDEMNITY CO (ERIE) — Investment Memo
🐂 The Bull Case (Warren's voice)
The Ultimate Toll Booth: ERIE has achieved the "holy grail" of insurance—capturing the upside of growth without the downside of underwriting risk. They don't gamble on the probability of accidents; they collect a fee for the privilege of managing the process. It is a service business masquerading as an insurance company.
The Agent Fortress: The moat isn't the product; it's the plumbing. The agent network is deeply integrated into ERIE's operational flow. Replacing this infrastructure would be an operational heart attack for the agents. High switching costs create a predictable, recurring revenue stream that compounds as the Exchange grows.
Capital Light, Ego Light: Management isn't playing "empire builder." No wasteful acquisitions, $0.0B in debt, and a disciplined approach to reinvestment. This is a business that generates cash without needing to feed the machine constant capital.
Attractive Entry: Because the market sees "Insurance" and fears "Underwriting Risk," they often misprice ERIE. It becomes genuinely attractive when the P/E compresses to a level that ignores the structural safety of the fee-based model.
🐻 The Bear Case (Charlie inverts)
The Stroke-of-the-Pen Risk: The business exists because of a specific relationship between the management company and the Exchange. If regulators decide the management fees are "excessive" or "unfair" to the mutual policyholders, the revenue model could be legislated away overnight. Structural impairment via regulation.
The Mutual Parasite: ERIE Indemnity is a parasite—in the biological, non-pejorative sense. It cannot exist without the Erie Insurance Exchange. If the Exchange suffers a catastrophic underwriting failure or a "black swan" event that bankrupts the mutual, the management company's revenue vanishes. They aren't taking the risk, but they are tethered to it.
The Digital Leapfrog: The "plumbing" moat only works if the pipes are the only way to move water. If a competitor creates a direct-to-consumer or AI-driven administrative layer that makes the agent-centric model obsolete, the switching costs evaporate.
Most Likely Failure: Regulatory intervention on fee structures. Timeframe: 10+ years, but binary in impact.
💰 Valuation & Margin of Safety
The lack of FCF data is a glaring void. We are forced to rely on Net Income, which is a "suggestion," but the pristine balance sheet provides a floor.
Intrinsic value estimate: $115.00per share (Based on a conservative 15x multiple of normalized NI, accounting for the 2018 reporting noise).
25% margin of safety entry: $86.25(Conservative)
50% margin of safety entry: $57.50(Buffett's ideal)
Current Status: Fairly valued to slightly expensive. The market has begun to recognize the "toll booth" nature of the business, erasing the deep discount that usually attracts Berkshire.
Verdict: WATCH
The moat is a fortress and the business model is glorious. However, the current price lacks the fat pitch margin of safety required for a high-conviction entry. We wait for a market spasm to bring the price toward $85.00.
Other Analyst Views· Lynch · Damodaran
Research Notes· Money Model · Moat · Financials · Management
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (10-K only). For educational purposes — not investment advice.