Berkshire requires a 25–50% discount to intrinsic value before buying.
Buffett Quality Checklist
✓ROE >15% consistently (≥7 of last 10 years)
✓Free cash flow positive (≥8 of last 10 years)
✗Conservative leverage — Debt/Equity below 1
✗Revenue growing at CAGR >5%
✗EPS growing at CAGR >5%
10-Year Financial History — SEC EDGAR 10-K Filings
Year▲
Revenue▲
Net Income▲
FCF▲
Owner Earnings▲
ROE▲
Net Margin▲
LT Debt▲
Cash▲
2016
$30.4B
$13.5B
—
—
71.5%
44.4%
$26.3B
$8.2B
2017
$26.1B
$4.6B
—
—
22.6%
17.7%
$30.8B
$7.6B
2018
$22.1B
$5.5B
$7.5B
$4.8B
25.5%
24.7%
$24.6B
$17.9B
2019
$5.3B
$5.4B
$8.3B
$4.8B
23.9%
102.0%
$22.1B
$11.6B
2020
$5.5B
$123.0M
$7.5B
-$239.0M
0.7%
2.2%
$31.4B
$6.0B
2021
$27.3B
$6.2B
$10.8B
$6.0B
29.5%
22.8%
$26.7B
$5.3B
2022
$27.3B
$4.6B
$8.3B
$4.2B
21.6%
16.8%
$25.2B
$5.4B
2023
$27.1B
$5.7B
$7.4B
$5.4B
24.8%
20.9%
$25.0B
—
2024
$28.8B
$480.0M
$10.3B
$338.0M
2.5%
1.7%
$26.7B
—
2025
$29.4B
$8.5B
$9.5B
$8.3B
37.5%
28.9%
$24.9B
—
Warren & Charlie
Buffett / Munger — quality, moat & valuation
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. (GILD) — Investment Memo
🐂 The Bull Case (Warren's voice)
The moat is durable only as long as the patent clock ticks. HIV is a chronic, sticky therapy – patients don’t switch unless forced. Biktarvy’s $11–12B revenue is a cash machine today.
Economics are exceptional right now. Gross margins are high, FCF consistently beats net income (e.g., $9.5B FCF vs. $8.5B NI in 2025). The business throws off $8–10B of free cash yearly – a genuine cash cow, albeit a shrinking one.
At a sufficient discount, this becomes a liquidating value play. If Biktarvy dies but the company returns capital via buybacks and dividends, a low entry price could still produce acceptable returns. The DCF suggests intrinsic value of $115.58/share – but only if you believe the terminal growth story.
🐻 The Bear Case (Charlie inverts)
Scenario #1: The Patent Cliff (Most Likely, 2028–2030). Biktarvy’s U.S. patent expires. Generics carve 80–90% of revenue within two years. Gilead has no pipeline replacement of equal size – cell therapy and Trodelvy combined are < $4B. Revenue collapses to < $15B, FCF halves, and the moat is gone.
Scenario #2: The Acquisition Trap. Management’s track record: $21B for Trodelvy (Immunomedics) – returns tiny. Future desperation acquisitions (e.g., another oncology bet) destroy billions more, leveraging the balance sheet and diluting remaining cash flows.
Scenario #3: Regulatory / Pricing Shock. U.S. government or insurers demand HIV drug price cuts (IRA negotiation). Even before patents expire, net revenue per patient drops. Biktarvy’s 73% HIV share makes it a target.
Most likely: The patent cliff. Over a 3–5 year horizon, the business shifts from “moated cash cow” to “generic-addled biotech.”
💰 Valuation & Margin of Safety
Intrinsic value estimate:$115.58 / share (DCF: 3.4% FCF growth, 10% discount, 3% terminal). But this assumes the patent cliff is somehow avoided – a heroic assumption.
25% margin of safety entry:$86.69 / share – still prices in gentle decline, not a revenue collapse.
50% margin of safety entry:$57.79 / share – Buffett’s ideal: a cigar butt with one more puff, but you must be willing to sell before the stub burns.
Current price: (Not given, but GILD trades ~$90). At ~$90, you’re paying above the 25% safety zone and far above the 50% floor. The stock is fair-to-expensive given the structural threat.
Verdict: PASS
The moat is a rental, not an ownership – Biktarvy’s patent cliff is a permanent impairment that no DCF can finesse, and management has proven incapable of replacing it. Even at a 25% discount, the business lacks the compounding economics Berkshire demands. Let others chase the cigar butt.
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (10-K only). For educational purposes — not investment advice.