Keysight Technologies, Inc.

KEYS· FY2025 10-K· Analyzed 1 mo ago
Growth Rates — CAGR from SEC 10-K XBRL filings
Revenue
6.5%
FY2015–2025
Net Income
-8.9%
FY2022–2025
Free Cash Flow
16.3%
FY2015–2025
EPS (Diluted)
5.0%
FY2015–2025
Latest Metrics — FY2025 · SEC XBRL
Return on Equity
14.5%
NI ÷ Equity
Return on Assets
7.5%
NI ÷ Assets
Net Profit Margin
15.8%
NI ÷ Revenue
Debt / Equity
0.43x
LT Debt ÷ Equity
Intrinsic Value Estimate — DCF (10% discount · 3% terminal · FCF growth capped 15%)
Total Business Value
$45.9B
Per Share (approx.)
$267.09
25% Margin of Safety
$200.32
Conservative entry
50% Margin of Safety
$133.55
Buffett's ideal entry
Growth Rate Used
15.0%
Latest FCF
$1.3B

Berkshire requires a 25–50% discount to intrinsic value before buying.

Buffett Quality Checklist
ROE >15% consistently (≥7 of last 10 years)
Free cash flow positive (≥8 of last 10 years)
Conservative leverage — Debt/Equity below 1
Revenue growing at CAGR >5%
EPS growing at CAGR >5%
10-Year Financial History — SEC EDGAR 10-K Filings
YearRevenueNet IncomeFCFOwner EarningsROENet MarginLT DebtCash
2016$2.9B$329.0M$1.1B$783.0M
2017$3.2B$256.0M$2.0B$818.0M
2018$3.9B$423.0M$1.3B$913.0M
2019$4.3B$878.0M$1.8B$1.6B
2020$4.2B$899.0M$1.8B$1.8B
2021$4.9B$1.1B$1.8B$2.1B
2022$5.4B$1.1B$959.0M$1.1B27.0%20.7%$1.8B$2.0B
2023$5.5B$1.1B$1.2B$980.0M22.7%19.3%$1.8B$2.5B
2024$5.0B$614.0M$898.0M$586.0M12.0%12.3%$1.8B$1.8B
2025$5.4B$850.0M$1.3B$853.0M14.5%15.8%$2.5B$1.9B
Warren & Charlie
Buffett / Munger — quality, moat & valuation

Keysight Technologies, Inc. (KEYS) — Investment Memo

🐂 The Bull Case (Warren's voice)

  • The "Gold Standard" Moat: Keysight is the final exam for the world’s most mission-critical technologies. When an engineer builds a satellite, a 5G network, or a quantum computer, the cost of equipment failure is bankruptcy, not just a bug. They won't pinch pennies on the measurement tool. That is a fortress.
  • Sticky Ecosystems: We aren't just buying hardware; we are buying a recurring subscription to the R&D cycle. Once a lab standardizes on Keysight, they are locked in. The "boxes" get their foot in the door, but the software and service renewals generate the high-margin, predictable cash flow we crave.
  • The Cash Flow Reality: While the accountants are busy adjusting earnings downward, the cash hitting the bank is undeniable. A company that generates $1.3B in FCF while the reported NI is $0.8B suggests a business that is effectively "under-earning" in the eyes of the street but printing money in reality. If you strip away the M&A accounting noise, you have a capital-efficient compounder.

🐻 The Bear Case (Charlie inverts)

  • The "Empire Building" Trap: Management has developed a bad habit: buying growth because they cannot create it. When organic growth stalls, the CFO starts looking for "synergies" through M&A. This is how great companies become mediocre conglomerates. Buying Spirent and ESI is an admission that their internal R&D isn't moving the needle fast enough. Eventually, they will overpay for a lemon, or worse, destroy the culture of the acquired firm.
  • The Virtualization Suicide: Keysight is a "hardware-first" business trying to pivot to software. The structural threat is software simulation. As compute power increases, digital twins and AI-driven testing environments will increasingly simulate hardware performance without needing the physical "box." If the world moves to pure simulation, Keysight’s expensive hardware legacy becomes a collection of very high-quality paperweights.
  • The Cycle of Obsolescence: They are tethered to the capital expenditure budgets of the telecommunications and industrial sectors. When those industries hit a structural plateau or a technological dead-end, Keysight doesn’t just see a dip; they see a long, grinding decline in relevance.

💰 Valuation & Margin of Safety

Using the DCF model, the math suggests:

  • Intrinsic value estimate: $267.09 per share
  • 25% margin of safety entry: $200.32 (conservative)
  • 50% margin of safety entry: $133.55 (Buffett's ideal)

Is it cheap? Currently, the market is pricing this based on hope for growth, not the reality of their M&A addiction. It is trading at a premium to its organic growth capacity, making it fairly valued to slightly expensive depending on how much you trust their M&A integration.

Verdict: [WATCH]

While Keysight possesses a formidable moat in the R&D infrastructure market, the reliance on constant M&A to prop up sluggish organic growth invites too much execution risk. We will hold our cash and wait for a significant price correction to provide a true margin of safety, as the current valuation assumes a perfection in integration that management has yet to prove. The business is fundamentally sound, but the price is not yet a bargain.

Research Notes· Money Model · Moat · Financials · Management

Data sourced from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (10-K only). For educational purposes — not investment advice.