Berkshire requires a 25–50% discount to intrinsic value before buying.
Buffett Quality Checklist
✗ROE >15% consistently (≥7 of last 10 years)
✗Free cash flow positive (≥8 of last 10 years)
–Conservative leverage — Debt/Equity below 1
✓Revenue growing at CAGR >5%
✓EPS growing at CAGR >5%
10-Year Financial History — SEC EDGAR 10-K Filings
Year▲
Revenue▲
Net Income▲
FCF▲
Owner Earnings▲
ROE▲
Net Margin▲
LT Debt▲
Cash▲
2016
$1.7B
$56.6M
$21.1M
$57.1M
8.7%
3.3%
—
$34.4M
2017
$2.0B
$72.1M
-$62.0M
$77.5M
9.6%
3.7%
—
$151.7M
2018
$2.3B
$107.7M
-$10.7M
$114.1M
12.6%
4.7%
—
$21.5M
2019
$2.5B
$127.6M
$61.1M
$139.0M
12.7%
5.1%
—
—
2020
$3.0B
$239.9M
$156.7M
$245.8M
19.1%
7.9%
—
—
2021
$3.7B
$396.9M
-$42.1M
$388.5M
24.4%
10.6%
—
—
2022
$4.1B
$490.7M
$174.7M
$498.5M
23.7%
11.9%
—
—
2023
$4.0B
$465.4M
$546.4M
$475.4M
18.5%
11.5%
—
—
2024
$4.5B
$563.7M
$171.3M
$572.7M
19.2%
12.5%
—
—
2025
$4.4B
$402.9M
$127.7M
$412.2M
12.7%
9.1%
—
—
Warren & Charlie
Buffett / Munger — quality, moat & valuation
M/I HOMES, INC. (MHO) — Investment Memo
🐂 The Bull Case (Warren's voice)
Admittedly, we are searching for a diamond in a coal mine here.
The Demographic Tailwind: The moat isn't in the "box," it's in the scarcity. There is a structural undersupply of single-family homes in the US. MHO is a vehicle to capture that demand.
Operational Leanliness: While it's a commodity business, the "win" comes from cost discipline. If they can execute the build-cycle faster than the regional players, they capture a spread that looks like a moat on the income statement.
Financial Services Float: That 3% revenue from mortgages and title insurance is a small but sweet addition. It increases the lifetime value of the customer and provides a tiny bit of high-margin glue to the transaction.
The "Wait for the Crash" Price: This becomes attractive only if the price reflects a deeply distressed cyclical trough. We don't buy "fair" in a commodity business; we buy "absurdly cheap."
Attractive Entry: Genuinely interesting only if the price drops to a level where we are paying for the land bank and getting the homebuilding operation for free.
🐻 The Bear Case (Charlie inverts)
"Show me where I'll die and I won't go there."
The Inventory Death Spiral: Management is buying land while cash flow is cratering. If the housing market hits a structural ceiling or interest rates remain "higher for longer," MHO is left holding overpriced dirt they cannot liquidate without taking massive write-downs. This is the classic homebuilder's grave.
The Accounting Mirage: The chasm between Net Income ($0.4B) and FCF ($0.1B) is a flashing red light. When NI consistently dwarfs FCF, you aren't running a business; you're running a spreadsheet. If the cash never hits the bank, the earnings are a fiction.
The Commodity Trap: With zero pricing power and no brand loyalty, MHO is a slave to the macro. They cannot raise prices to offset inflation in lumber or labor without killing demand. They are squeezed from both ends.
Most Likely Failure: The Inventory Trap. Timeframe: 12–24 months. A sudden correction in home prices renders their current land acquisitions toxic assets, leading to a liquidity crunch.
💰 Valuation & Margin of Safety
The DCF is a mathematical exercise, but the cash flow divergence makes it a dangerous one.
Intrinsic value estimate: $177.59 per share.
25% margin of safety entry: $133.19(conservative).
50% margin of safety entry: $88.80(Buffett's ideal).
Current Status: Overvalued/Dangerous. The DCF assumes 15% FCF growth, but the current FCF is a fraction of Net Income. The model is built on "hope," not "hard cash."
Verdict: PASS
Price is irrelevant when the business model is a commodity and the capital allocation is reckless. The divergence between accounting profits and actual cash is a non-starter for Berkshire. We do not bet on "boxes" when the builders are burning the furniture to keep warm.
Research Notes· Money Model · Moat · Financials · Management
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (10-K only). For educational purposes — not investment advice.