M/I HOMES, INC.

MHO· FY2025 10-K· Analyzed 1 mo ago
PASS
Growth Rates — CAGR from SEC 10-K XBRL filings
Revenue
12.0%
FY2015–2025
Net Income
22.8%
FY2015–2025
Free Cash Flow
35.0%
FY2015–2025
EPS (Diluted)
24.3%
FY2015–2025
Latest Metrics — FY2025 · SEC XBRL
Return on Equity
12.7%
NI ÷ Equity
Return on Assets
8.4%
NI ÷ Assets
Net Profit Margin
9.1%
NI ÷ Revenue
Debt / Equity
LT Debt ÷ Equity
Intrinsic Value Estimate — DCF (10% discount · 3% terminal · FCF growth capped 15%)
Total Business Value
$4.6B
Per Share (approx.)
$177.59
25% Margin of Safety
$133.20
Conservative entry
50% Margin of Safety
$88.80
Buffett's ideal entry
Growth Rate Used
15.0%
Latest FCF
$127.7M

Berkshire requires a 25–50% discount to intrinsic value before buying.

Buffett Quality Checklist
ROE >15% consistently (≥7 of last 10 years)
Free cash flow positive (≥8 of last 10 years)
Conservative leverage — Debt/Equity below 1
Revenue growing at CAGR >5%
EPS growing at CAGR >5%
10-Year Financial History — SEC EDGAR 10-K Filings
YearRevenueNet IncomeFCFOwner EarningsROENet MarginLT DebtCash
2016$1.7B$56.6M$21.1M$57.1M8.7%3.3%$34.4M
2017$2.0B$72.1M-$62.0M$77.5M9.6%3.7%$151.7M
2018$2.3B$107.7M-$10.7M$114.1M12.6%4.7%$21.5M
2019$2.5B$127.6M$61.1M$139.0M12.7%5.1%
2020$3.0B$239.9M$156.7M$245.8M19.1%7.9%
2021$3.7B$396.9M-$42.1M$388.5M24.4%10.6%
2022$4.1B$490.7M$174.7M$498.5M23.7%11.9%
2023$4.0B$465.4M$546.4M$475.4M18.5%11.5%
2024$4.5B$563.7M$171.3M$572.7M19.2%12.5%
2025$4.4B$402.9M$127.7M$412.2M12.7%9.1%
Warren & Charlie
Buffett / Munger — quality, moat & valuation

M/I HOMES, INC. (MHO) — Investment Memo

🐂 The Bull Case (Warren's voice)

Admittedly, we are searching for a diamond in a coal mine here.

  • The Demographic Tailwind: The moat isn't in the "box," it's in the scarcity. There is a structural undersupply of single-family homes in the US. MHO is a vehicle to capture that demand.
  • Operational Leanliness: While it's a commodity business, the "win" comes from cost discipline. If they can execute the build-cycle faster than the regional players, they capture a spread that looks like a moat on the income statement.
  • Financial Services Float: That 3% revenue from mortgages and title insurance is a small but sweet addition. It increases the lifetime value of the customer and provides a tiny bit of high-margin glue to the transaction.
  • The "Wait for the Crash" Price: This becomes attractive only if the price reflects a deeply distressed cyclical trough. We don't buy "fair" in a commodity business; we buy "absurdly cheap."
  • Attractive Entry: Genuinely interesting only if the price drops to a level where we are paying for the land bank and getting the homebuilding operation for free.

🐻 The Bear Case (Charlie inverts)

"Show me where I'll die and I won't go there."

  • The Inventory Death Spiral: Management is buying land while cash flow is cratering. If the housing market hits a structural ceiling or interest rates remain "higher for longer," MHO is left holding overpriced dirt they cannot liquidate without taking massive write-downs. This is the classic homebuilder's grave.
  • The Accounting Mirage: The chasm between Net Income ($0.4B) and FCF ($0.1B) is a flashing red light. When NI consistently dwarfs FCF, you aren't running a business; you're running a spreadsheet. If the cash never hits the bank, the earnings are a fiction.
  • The Commodity Trap: With zero pricing power and no brand loyalty, MHO is a slave to the macro. They cannot raise prices to offset inflation in lumber or labor without killing demand. They are squeezed from both ends.
  • Most Likely Failure: The Inventory Trap. Timeframe: 12–24 months. A sudden correction in home prices renders their current land acquisitions toxic assets, leading to a liquidity crunch.

💰 Valuation & Margin of Safety

The DCF is a mathematical exercise, but the cash flow divergence makes it a dangerous one.

  • Intrinsic value estimate: $177.59 per share.
  • 25% margin of safety entry: $133.19 (conservative).
  • 50% margin of safety entry: $88.80 (Buffett's ideal).
  • Current Status: Overvalued/Dangerous. The DCF assumes 15% FCF growth, but the current FCF is a fraction of Net Income. The model is built on "hope," not "hard cash."

Verdict: PASS

Price is irrelevant when the business model is a commodity and the capital allocation is reckless. The divergence between accounting profits and actual cash is a non-starter for Berkshire. We do not bet on "boxes" when the builders are burning the furniture to keep warm.

Research Notes· Money Model · Moat · Financials · Management

Data sourced from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (10-K only). For educational purposes — not investment advice.