Berkshire requires a 25–50% discount to intrinsic value before buying.
Buffett Quality Checklist
✓ROE >15% consistently (≥7 of last 10 years)
✓Free cash flow positive (≥8 of last 10 years)
✓Conservative leverage — Debt/Equity below 1
✓Revenue growing at CAGR >5%
✓EPS growing at CAGR >5%
10-Year Financial History — SEC EDGAR 10-K Filings
Year▲
Revenue▲
Net Income▲
FCF▲
Owner Earnings▲
ROE▲
Net Margin▲
LT Debt▲
Cash▲
2016
$278.8M
$260.9M
$410.1M
$262.9M
82.1%
93.6%
$2.1B
$791.8M
2017
$301.2M
$304.0M
$371.0M
$306.2M
75.8%
100.9%
$2.1B
$889.5M
2018
$1.4B
$507.9M
$582.5M
$509.0M
—
35.4%
$2.6B
$904.2M
2019
$1.6B
$563.6M
$680.4M
$564.5M
—
36.2%
$3.1B
$1.5B
2020
$1.7B
$601.8M
$789.3M
$609.8M
—
35.5%
$3.4B
$1.3B
2021
$2.0B
$726.0M
$922.6M
$741.4M
—
35.5%
$4.2B
$1.4B
2022
$2.2B
$870.6M
$1.1B
$883.8M
—
38.7%
$4.5B
$993.6M
2023
$2.5B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.1B
—
45.4%
$4.5B
$461.7M
2024
$2.9B
$1.1B
$1.5B
$1.1B
—
38.8%
$4.5B
$409.4M
2025
$3.1B
$1.2B
$1.5B
$1.2B
—
38.4%
$6.2B
$515.3M
Warren & Charlie
Buffett / Munger — quality, moat & valuation
MSCI Inc. (MSCI) — Investment Memo
🐂 The Bull Case (Warren's voice)
The Ultimate Toll Bridge: MSCI doesn't just sell a product; they sell the standard. When an asset manager builds a fund around an MSCI index, the index becomes the foundation. You don't rip out the foundation of a skyscraper just to save a few basis points.
The "Tax" Economics:
Pricing Power: They possess the rare ability to raise prices without losing customers because the cost of switching is far higher than the cost of the fee increase.
Asset-Light Scalability: Revenue grew from $0.3B to $3.1B without a corresponding explosion in CAPEX. This is the dream: earnings that grow while the cost to maintain the moat remains flat.
Cash Quality: FCF of $1.5B exceeding Net Income of $1.2B proves the earnings are "real." This isn't accounting magic; it's a cash machine.
Attractive Entry: We love a "Wonderful Company at a Fair Price." This becomes a Berkshire-grade investment when the market forgets how durable the moat is and prices it like a mere software company rather than a global financial utility.
🐻 The Bear Case (Charlie inverts)
Scenario 1: The "Internalization" Threat: The biggest risk isn't a competitor; it's the customers. If the "Big Three" (BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street) decide the "tax" is too high and successfully pivot the industry to an open-source or proprietary internal standard, MSCI's network effect evaporates. The lingua franca only works if everyone agrees to speak it.
Scenario 2: Regulatory Price Caps: If benchmarks are deemed "essential infrastructure" by global regulators (similar to utilities or credit rating agencies post-2008), we could see mandated fee caps. This would kill the pricing power that drives the valuation.
Scenario 3: The Passive Pivot: A systemic collapse in the "passive" investing trend. If a generational shift returns capital to hyper-active, non-benchmark-driven strategies, the core subscription engine stalls.
Most Likely Threat: Internalization. Over a 5–10 year horizon, the incentive for giant asset managers to stop paying a "permanent tax" is immense. If they crack the code on a competing standard, the moat is breached.
💰 Valuation & Margin of Safety
Based on a DCF of $55.5B total valuation.
Intrinsic value estimate: $755.32 per share.
25% margin of safety entry: $566.49(Conservative).
50% margin of safety entry: $377.66(Buffett's ideal).
Current Status: Expensive. Unless the market offers a significant discount to the $755.32 mark, we are paying for perfection. We do not buy "wonderful" companies at "speculative" prices.
Verdict: WATCH
The moat is a fortress, but the current valuation leaves no room for error. We wait for a market panic to bring the price toward $566. Conviction in the business is absolute; conviction in the current price is zero.
Other Analyst Views· Lynch · Damodaran
Research Notes· Money Model · Moat · Financials · Management
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (10-K only). For educational purposes — not investment advice.