ORACLE CORP

ORCL· FY2025 10-K· Analyzed 1 mo ago
PASS
Growth Rates — CAGR from SEC 10-K XBRL filings
Revenue
4.1%
FY2015–2025
Net Income
2.3%
FY2015–2025
Free Cash Flow
-0.7%
FY2016–2025
EPS (Diluted)
7.0%
FY2015–2025
Latest Metrics — FY2025 · SEC XBRL
Return on Equity
60.8%
NI ÷ Equity
Return on Assets
7.4%
NI ÷ Assets
Net Profit Margin
21.7%
NI ÷ Revenue
Debt / Equity
LT Debt ÷ Equity
Intrinsic Value Estimate — DCF (10% discount · 3% terminal · FCF growth capped 15%)
Total Business Value
$173.7B
Per Share (approx.)
$61.89
25% Margin of Safety
$46.42
Conservative entry
50% Margin of Safety
$30.95
Buffett's ideal entry
Growth Rate Used
3.0%
Latest FCF
$11.8B

Berkshire requires a 25–50% discount to intrinsic value before buying.

Buffett Quality Checklist
ROE >15% consistently (≥7 of last 10 years)
Free cash flow positive (≥8 of last 10 years)
Conservative leverage — Debt/Equity below 1
Revenue growing at CAGR >5%
EPS growing at CAGR >5%
10-Year Financial History — SEC EDGAR 10-K Filings
YearRevenueNet IncomeFCFOwner EarningsROENet MarginLT DebtCash
2016$37.0B$8.9B$12.5B$8.6B18.8%24.0%$20.2B
2017$37.8B$9.5B$12.1B$8.4B17.5%25.0%$21.8B
2018$39.4B$3.6B$13.7B$3.0B7.7%9.1%$21.6B
2019$39.5B$11.1B$12.9B$10.7B50.9%28.1%$20.5B
2020$39.1B$10.1B$11.6B$10.0B83.9%25.9%$37.2B
2021$40.5B$13.7B$13.8B$13.1B262.4%34.0%$30.1B
2022$42.4B$6.7B$5.0B$4.2B15.8%$0$21.4B
2023$50.0B$8.5B$8.5B$2.3B792.5%17.0%$9.8B
2024$53.0B$10.5B$11.8B$6.7B120.3%19.8%$10.5B
2025$57.4B$12.4B-$394.0M-$4.9B60.8%21.7%$10.8B
Warren & Charlie
Buffett / Munger — quality, moat & valuation

ORACLE CORP (ORCL) — Investment Memo

🐂 The Bull Case (Warren's voice)

  • The "Mission-Critical" Moat: Oracle doesn't sell software; it sells certainty. When a global bank or a national government stores its core ledger in an Oracle database, the cost of switching isn't just a line item—it's a corporate heart transplant.
  • Pricing Power via Inertia: The "Hotel California" effect is a powerful engine for margins. They don't need to be the most innovative company in the valley; they just need to be too painful to leave.
  • Cloud Transition: If they successfully migrate their legacy on-premise base to OCI (Oracle Cloud Infrastructure), they convert lumpy license fees into an infinite annuity.
  • Attractive Entry: This becomes a Berkshire-style play only if the market stops valuing it as a "AI Growth Story" and starts valuing it as a "Legacy Utility."
  • The Price of Admission: We only swing when the price reflects the stagnation of the legacy business, not the promise of the cloud.

🐻 The Bear Case (Charlie inverts)

“Show me where I'll die and I won't go there.”

  • The "Accounting Mirage": The gap between Net Income ($12.4B) and FCF (-$0.4B) is a screaming siren. When profits are a result of accounting entries rather than cash hitting the bank, you aren't buying a business—you're buying a spreadsheet.
  • CapEx Treadmill: To compete with AWS and Azure, Oracle is forced into a brutal capital expenditure war. They are spending billions on data centers just to stay relevant. This isn't compounding; it's treading water in a gold-plated suit.
  • The Open-Source Erosion: The "Hotel California" is developing a back door. The rise of PostgreSQL and cloud-native databases is slowly chipping away at the proprietary lock-in. The moat is drying up, not widening.
  • The Most Likely Death: A permanent impairment caused by capital misallocation. Management is spending cash they don't have (based on FCF) to build a cloud empire they may never dominate. Timeframe: 3–5 years.

💰 Valuation & Margin of Safety

Reacting to the DCF: $173.7B Total / $61.89 per share.

  • Intrinsic value estimate: $61.89
  • 25% margin of safety entry: $46.42 (conservative)
  • 50% margin of safety entry: $30.95 (Buffett's ideal)
  • Current Status: Grossly Expensive.
  • The market is pricing in a flawless AI-driven cloud ascent. Our DCF reflects the reality of the cash flows. The gap between the current market price and intrinsic value is an abyss.

Verdict: PASS

The price is a fantasy that ignores the catastrophic divergence between net income and free cash flow. While the switching costs provide a durable moat, we do not pay growth-stock multiples for a legacy-plumbing business. We will wait for the "AI hype" to evaporate and the price to return to the realm of sanity.

Research Notes· Money Model · Moat · Financials · Management

Data sourced from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (10-K only). For educational purposes — not investment advice.