PRICE T ROWE GROUP INC

TROW· FY2025 10-K· Analyzed 1 mo ago
PASS
Growth Rates — CAGR from SEC 10-K XBRL filings
Revenue
11.9%
FY2010–2025
Net Income
5.5%
FY2015–2025
Free Cash Flow
0.7%
FY2015–2025
EPS (Diluted)
7.2%
FY2015–2025
Latest Metrics — FY2025 · SEC XBRL
Return on Equity
19.2%
NI ÷ Equity
Return on Assets
14.6%
NI ÷ Assets
Net Profit Margin
28.5%
NI ÷ Revenue
Debt / Equity
LT Debt ÷ Equity
Intrinsic Value Estimate — DCF (10% discount · 3% terminal · FCF growth capped 15%)
Total Business Value
$21.8B
Per Share (approx.)
$99.81
25% Margin of Safety
$74.86
Conservative entry
50% Margin of Safety
$49.90
Buffett's ideal entry
Growth Rate Used
3.0%
Latest FCF
$1.5B

Berkshire requires a 25–50% discount to intrinsic value before buying.

Buffett Quality Checklist
ROE >15% consistently (≥7 of last 10 years)
Free cash flow positive (≥8 of last 10 years)
Conservative leverage — Debt/Equity below 1
Revenue growing at CAGR >5%
EPS growing at CAGR >5%
10-Year Financial History — SEC EDGAR 10-K Filings
YearRevenueNet IncomeFCFOwner EarningsROENet MarginLT DebtCash
2016$4.3B$1.2B$22.2M24.3%28.4%$1.2B
2017$4.9B$1.5B$43.4M25.7%30.9%$1.9B
2018$5.4B$1.8B$1.5B30.0%34.2%$1.4B
2019$5.6B$2.1B$1.3B30.0%37.9%$1.8B
2020$6.2B$2.4B$1.7B30.8%38.2%$2.2B
2021$7.7B$3.1B$3.2B34.2%40.2%$1.5B
2022$6.5B$1.6B$2.1B17.6%24.0%$1.8B
2023$6.5B$1.8B$911.2M18.8%27.7%$2.1B
2024$7.1B$2.1B$1.3B20.3%29.6%$2.6B
2025$7.3B$2.1B$1.5B19.2%28.5%$3.4B
Warren & Charlie
Buffett / Munger — quality, moat & valuation

PRICE T ROWE GROUP INC (TROW) — Investment Memo

🐂 The Bull Case (Warren's voice)

  • The Toll Bridge: TROW doesn't manufacture widgets; it collects a fee on assets. It is a "toll booth" on the road to retirement.
  • Sticky Plumbing: The moat isn't just performance—it's inertia. Being embedded in 401(k) plans creates a massive switching cost. Most retirees are too lazy or intimidated to move their life savings, even if the alpha fades.
  • Capital Light: This is the dream. No factories, no inventory, no massive CAPEX. The business scales by hiring brains, not building plants.
  • The Pivot: The OHA acquisition shows they recognize the cliff. Moving into alternatives creates a higher-fee floor and diversifies the revenue away from pure equity beta.
  • Attractive Entry: If we can buy this at a significant discount to its cash-generating power, we are buying a high-ROE machine for a fraction of its replacement cost.
  • Price Range: Genuinely attractive below $80, where the yield becomes a formidable weapon and the downside is protected by the balance sheet.

🐻 The Bear Case (Charlie inverts)

“Show me where I'll die and I won't go there.”

  • The Passive Juggernaut: The structural shift from active to passive management isn't a "trend"—it's a migration. TROW is fighting a war against Vanguard and BlackRock where the enemy's primary weapon is "near-zero fees." You cannot out-manage a zero-fee index over 30 years.
  • The Cash Flow Mirage: Net Income is $2.1B, but FCF is only $1.5B. A 0.7% FCF CAGR against an 11.9% revenue CAGR is a glaring red flag. It suggests the "earnings" are accounting artifacts and the actual cash is leaking out of the building.
  • The Alternative Trap: Buying OHA is a desperate hedge. Entering the alternatives space puts them in a crowded room with giants who have more scale and better networks. It's an admission that the core active equity business is a dying breed.
  • The Most Likely Death: Slow bleed via fee compression. A decade of shrinking margins as clients demand lower fees for the same (or worse) performance. Timeframe: 3–7 years until the "sticky" 401(k) plumbing finally rusts through.

💰 Valuation & Margin of Safety

The DCF is conservative on growth, but the FCF/NI gap suggests we should be even more cautious.

  • Intrinsic value estimate: $99.81 per share
  • 25% margin of safety entry: $74.86 (Conservative)
  • 50% margin of safety entry: $49.91 (Buffett's ideal)
  • Current Status: Fairly valued to slightly expensive. At current market prices (typically $100–$120), there is no margin of safety; we would be paying full price for a business in structural decline.

Verdict: PASS

The gap between net income and free cash flow is a poison pill we cannot ignore. While the 401(k) moat is real, it is being eroded by the unstoppable tide of passive indexing. We do not buy "melting ice cubes" unless the price is so low that the dividend alone pays for the mistake.

Research Notes· Money Model · Moat · Financials · Management

Data sourced from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (10-K only). For educational purposes — not investment advice.