Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

TXRH· FY2025 10-K· Analyzed 1 mo ago
WATCH
Growth Rates — CAGR from SEC 10-K XBRL filings
Revenue
12.5%
FY2015–2025
Net Income
15.8%
FY2015–2022
Free Cash Flow
20.2%
FY2015–2025
EPS (Diluted)
16.1%
FY2015–2025
Latest Metrics — FY2022 · SEC XBRL
Return on Equity
26.6%
NI ÷ Equity
Return on Assets
10.7%
NI ÷ Assets
Net Profit Margin
6.7%
NI ÷ Revenue
Debt / Equity
LT Debt ÷ Equity
Intrinsic Value Estimate — DCF (10% discount · 3% terminal · FCF growth capped 15%)
Total Business Value
$12.3B
Per Share (approx.)
$185.83
25% Margin of Safety
$139.37
Conservative entry
50% Margin of Safety
$92.92
Buffett's ideal entry
Growth Rate Used
15.0%
Latest FCF
$342.1M

Berkshire requires a 25–50% discount to intrinsic value before buying.

Buffett Quality Checklist
ROE >15% consistently (≥7 of last 10 years)
Free cash flow positive (≥8 of last 10 years)
Conservative leverage — Debt/Equity below 1
Revenue growing at CAGR >5%
EPS growing at CAGR >5%
10-Year Financial History — SEC EDGAR 10-K Filings
YearRevenueNet IncomeFCFOwner EarningsROENet MarginLT DebtCash
2016$2.0B$115.6M$92.3M$33.8M15.4%5.8%$112.9M
2017$2.2B$131.5M$124.7M$63.4M15.7%5.9%$150.9M
2018$2.5B$158.2M$196.9M$103.5M16.7%6.4%$210.1M
2019$2.8B$174.5M$160.0M$75.7M19.0%6.3%$107.9M
2020$2.4B$31.3M$76.0M-$5.3M3.4%1.3%$190.0M$363.2M
2021$3.5B$245.3M$268.1M$171.4M23.2%7.1%$100.0M$335.6M
2022$4.0B$269.8M$265.6M$160.9M26.6%6.7%$50.0M$173.9M
2023$4.6B$217.9M$0$104.2M
2024$5.4B$399.3M$245.2M
2025$5.9B$342.1M$134.7M
Warren & Charlie
Buffett / Munger — quality, moat & valuation

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) — Investment Memo

🐂 The Bull Case (Warren's voice)

  • The Moat is Operational, Not Emotional: This isn't a "brand" play where we hope people like the logo. This is a system play. They have mastered the "high-volume, low-margin-per-unit" game. By moving massive quantities of beef and beer with brutal efficiency, they create a cost advantage that competitors can't easily replicate without the same scale.
  • Compounding via Replication: The playbook is proven. They don't gamble on overpriced acquisitions; they build. The expansion into Bubba's 33 and Jaggers shows they can port their operational excellence into new niches without breaking the core engine.
  • Exceptional Capital Discipline: A 26.6% ROE is stellar, but the quality of that return is what matters. They are growing revenue from $2.0B to $5.9B using internal cash flows. They aren't borrowing their way to growth; they are earning it.
  • The "Owner-Earnings" Goldmine: FCF CAGR (20.2%) outpacing Net Income CAGR (15.8%) is the hallmark of a business that is becoming more cash-generative as it scales. It is a lean, mean, steak-selling machine.
  • Attractive Entry: To move from "great business" to "great investment," we need a price that accounts for the inevitable volatility of the protein market. I'd be interested if the price reflects a significant discount to the present value of those future cash flows.

🐻 The Bear Case (Charlie inverts)

  • The "Red Meat" Obsolescence: We aren't worried about a bad quarter. We are worried about a structural shift in human biology or sociology. If a systemic health crisis or a massive cultural pivot makes red meat "taboo" or prohibitively expensive for the middle class, this business doesn't just shrink—it evaporates.
  • The Labor Trap: The model relies on "brutal efficiency." If the cost of labor shifts from a linear expense to a structural, non-linear spike (e.g., permanent labor shortages or mandated wage floors that exceed the customer's willingness to pay), the unit economics collapse. You cannot "efficient" your way out of a fundamental lack of cooks.
  • The Saturation Ceiling: Eventually, you run out of corners in America. If the organic concepts (Bubba's/Jaggers) fail to capture new demographics, the company will be forced into the "Empire Building" phase—buying mediocre brands at high multiples just to keep the growth percentage steady.
  • Most Likely Threat: Labor structural failure. In a service-heavy model, the human element is the single point of failure. Over a 5–10 year horizon, this is the most likely catalyst for margin compression.

💰 Valuation & Margin of Safety

The DCF suggests a business that is performing beautifully, but the market rarely gives us a gift.

  • Intrinsic value estimate: $185.83 per share
  • 25% margin of safety entry: $139.37 (Conservative—provides a buffer for protein price shocks)
  • 50% margin of safety entry: $92.92 (The "Fat Pitch"—rare, but where the real wealth is made)
  • Current Status: Fairly valued to slightly expensive. If the market price is hugging the $185 mark, we are paying for all the optimism and none of the mistakes.

Verdict: WATCH

The business is a gold standard of operational efficiency, but the price offers no margin for error. We do not buy "fair"; we buy "cheap." We will keep this on the shortlist and strike if the market panics over a temporary beef price spike.

Other Analyst Views· Lynch · Damodaran
Research Notes· Money Model · Moat · Financials · Management

Data sourced from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (10-K only). For educational purposes — not investment advice.