Berkshire requires a 25–50% discount to intrinsic value before buying.
Buffett Quality Checklist
✗ROE >15% consistently (≥7 of last 10 years)
✓Free cash flow positive (≥8 of last 10 years)
–Conservative leverage — Debt/Equity below 1
✓Revenue growing at CAGR >5%
✓EPS growing at CAGR >5%
10-Year Financial History — SEC EDGAR 10-K Filings
Year▲
Revenue▲
Net Income▲
FCF▲
Owner Earnings▲
ROE▲
Net Margin▲
LT Debt▲
Cash▲
2016
$398.1M
-$112.1M
$179.5M
-$107.2M
-9.7%
-28.1%
—
$1.2B
2017
$714.7M
$263.5M
$745.5M
$225.5M
13.0%
36.9%
—
$1.7B
2018
$3.0B
$2.1B
$1.2B
$2.1B
47.3%
68.8%
—
$2.7B
2019
$4.2B
$1.2B
$1.5B
$1.2B
19.3%
28.3%
—
$3.1B
2020
$6.2B
$2.7B
$3.0B
$2.6B
31.2%
43.7%
—
$6.0B
2021
$7.6B
$2.3B
$2.4B
$2.2B
23.2%
30.9%
—
$6.8B
2022
$8.9B
$3.3B
$3.9B
$3.3B
23.9%
37.2%
—
$10.5B
2023
$9.9B
$3.6B
$3.3B
$3.6B
20.6%
36.7%
—
$10.4B
2024
$11.0B
-$535.6M
-$790.3M
-$626.1M
-3.3%
-4.9%
—
$4.6B
2025
$12.0B
$4.0B
$3.2B
$3.7B
21.2%
32.9%
—
$5.1B
Warren & Charlie
Buffett / Munger — quality, moat & valuation
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC / MA (VRTX) — Investment Memo
🐂 The Bull Case (Warren’s voice)
Moat is durable for a decade because of irreplaceable pricing power. Vertex’s CF modulators are the only effective therapy for a lethal genetic disease. Patients have no alternative, insurers must pay, and annual pricing at six figures is backed by life-or-death necessity. This creates a recurring revenue stream with enormous gross margins (>80%) and net margins averaging ~33%.
Economics are exceptional even for a monopoly. Zero debt, $3.2B free cash flow on $12B revenue, ROE of 21.2% (2025). Capital allocation is disciplined – $4.1B R&D reinvested into pipeline diversification (pain, sickle cell, T1D) and a single sensible acquisition (Alpine Immune Sciences). Share count flat – no dilution, no waste.
Attractive entry point below $340/share. At a 25% margin of safety on a conservative DCF (assuming slowed growth and terminal rate of 2%), intrinsic value is ~$450. A price of $340 offers a fair risk/reward for the next 5–7 years of CF monopoly cash flows. Below $225 (50% margin), it becomes a no-brainer for a bet on a pipeline lottery ticket.
🐻 The Bear Case (Charlie inverts)
Munger’s rule: “Show me where I’ll die and I won’t go there.”
Permane impairment #1: A one-time gene-editing cure for CF. Only ~90,000 patients globally. A cure (e.g., CRISPR-based) would eliminate the entire pill franchise overnight. Vertex has no pipeline that competes with a cure – only incremental modulators. This is the most likely structural threat over 10–15 years.
Permanent impairment #2: Patent cliff + generic entry. Trikafta patents begin expiring in the late 2020s. Next-gen drugs (vanzacaftor) may extend, but generic manufacturers with lower costs will erode pricing power. Without a new blockbuster, revenue drops 80–90% as competition emerges. This is a near-certainty by 2035.
Permanent impairment #3: Pipeline failure. Vertex is spending $4.1B/year on R&D to diversify into pain, sickle cell, and T1D. None of these are approved. If they fail, the stock is a single-disease company with declining CF revenue. Management’s current credibility rests on pipeline success – a binary bet.
Most likely scenario: Patent cliff + slower-than-expected new drug approvals erode revenue from $12B to $3–4B over the next 12–15 years. The stock would trade at a terminal value of <$200.
💰 Valuation & Margin of Safety
Intrinsic value estimate:$450/share (based on DCF with 15% FCF growth, 10% discount, 3% terminal). But this terminal growth rate is too optimistic for a shrinking CF monopoly – a more realistic 2% terminal and 12% discount yield ~$370.
25% margin of safety entry:$338(conservative, assumes some pipeline optionality)
50% margin of safety entry:$225(Buffett’s ideal – compensates for binary risk of a cure or patent cliff)
Current price (~$450):Fairly valued with no margin of safety. The market is pricing in high pipeline success odds, which we cannot confirm.
Verdict: PASS
Pass. Vertex’s monopoly on cystic fibrosis is real but finite, and the current price of $450 offers no margin of safety against the binary risk of a cure or patent cliff. We require a 50% discount to intrinsic value to compensate for the terminal risk of single-disease dependence – and that discount does not exist today.
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (10-K only). For educational purposes — not investment advice.