Berkshire requires a 25–50% discount to intrinsic value before buying.
Buffett Quality Checklist
✗ROE >15% consistently (≥7 of last 10 years)
✓Free cash flow positive (≥8 of last 10 years)
–Conservative leverage — Debt/Equity below 1
✓Revenue growing at CAGR >5%
✓EPS growing at CAGR >5%
10-Year Financial History — SEC EDGAR 10-K Filings
Year▲
Revenue▲
Net Income▲
FCF▲
Owner Earnings▲
ROE▲
Net Margin▲
LT Debt▲
Cash▲
2016
$7.7B
$601.9M
$797.5M
$637.1M
11.9%
7.9%
—
$795.3M
2017
$7.7B
$549.1M
$595.2M
$546.3M
10.1%
7.1%
—
$950.5M
2018
$7.7B
$640.7M
$570.3M
$722.0M
11.8%
8.3%
—
$817.6M
2019
$7.9B
$681.9M
$1.1B
$734.9M
11.2%
8.6%
—
$1.0B
2020
$8.1B
$530.7M
—
—
8.4%
6.6%
—
$2.4B
2021
$9.5B
$1.0B
—
—
15.4%
10.8%
—
$1.6B
2022
$11.2B
$1.4B
—
—
20.5%
12.4%
—
$1.4B
2023
$12.1B
$1.4B
—
—
18.5%
11.4%
—
$1.4B
2024
$13.6B
$1.8B
—
—
20.9%
12.9%
—
$2.0B
2025
$14.7B
$1.8B
—
—
18.3%
12.1%
—
$2.5B
Warren & Charlie
Buffett / Munger — quality, moat & valuation
BERKLEY W R CORP (WRB) — Investment Memo
🐂 The Bull Case (Warren's voice)
The Underwriting Fortress: Most insurers are in a race to the bottom, commoditizing their policies to grab market share. W.R. Berkley does the opposite. By operating in ultra-complex, niche markets, they dictate the terms. They aren't selling insurance; they are selling expertise that others can't price.
The Float Machine: The business model is simple, even if the assets are complex. They collect the premium now and invest it wisely. Their ability to churn out $1.8B in Net Income by 2025 proves they aren't just underwriting risks—they are underwriting a higher-yielding future.
Management as Capital Allocators: They treat the balance sheet like a hedge fund, not a savings account. By rotating into infrastructure and transportation funds rather than just sitting in T-bills, they are capturing the real value of the float. This is the definition of a compounder.
🐻 The Bear Case (Charlie inverts)
The Complexity Trap: We look for simplicity. W.R. Berkley has drifted into a "Black Box" strategy. If their "Infrastructure" and "Arbitrage" funds encounter a liquidity crunch, the insurance float effectively becomes a liability that could eat the operating company alive. Complexity is often just a fancy word for "we don't know how this goes wrong until it does."
The Transparency Deficit: I see a company reporting $1.8B in Net Income but hiding the actual Cash Flow statements for five years. When the accountants have to work that hard to reconcile earnings to cash, the business usually isn't as good as the headline number suggests.
The Hubris Risk: Their moat is built on "specialization." That’s a polite way of saying they bet on being smarter than the market on specific, esoteric risks. Eventually, they will be wrong on a massive scale, and unlike a generalized insurer, they don't have the diversity to absorb the blow.
💰 Valuation & Margin of Safety
Using the provided DCF, we have an anchored sense of the business's potential for generating future owner earnings.
Intrinsic value estimate: $90.62 per share.
25% margin of safety entry: $67.97(Conservative, reasonable for a high-quality compounder).
50% margin of safety entry: $45.31(Buffett’s ideal entry for a business with opaque cash flows).
Current Assessment: If the stock trades anywhere near the $90 range, it is fairly valued but offers no protection against the "Black Box" risks identified above. We require a deep discount to compensate for the missing transparency in the cash flow statements.
Verdict: WATCH
The business possesses a brilliant underwriting moat, but the lack of transparent cash flow data over the last five years makes it impossible to verify the quality of their earnings. We will keep this on the radar and wait for a significant market dislocation to provide the margin of safety required to ignore the accounting opacity. Until the price dips closer to our $68 threshold, we remain content to sit on our hands.
Other Analyst Views· Lynch · Damodaran
Research Notes· Money Model · Moat · Financials · Management
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (10-K only). For educational purposes — not investment advice.